Frictional force on a block on a ramp that has a wall holding it up

Last modified date

Comments: 0

Ramp with a block on it and a wall holding the block from sliding
Here is the drawing of the problem.

Today in class, students were asked to draw a force diagram for the drawing shown on the right. The drawing shows a block on a ramp with a “wall” holding it back. The question that we couldn’t answer easily is,

‘Does the friction between the ramp’s surface and the block need to be accounted for in the force diagram.’

Then, we can take this a step further, and ask

‘Does the frictional force between the wall and the block decrease the normal force provided by the ramp?’

We couldn’t decide, so this afternoon I created a quick test to see if I could answer it. Here is my experimental design:

Book on ramp with force sensor holding it from sliding.
Book on ramp with force sensor holding it from sliding.

I started with just the book on the metal ramp. I placed the book against the force sensor, then tapped a bunch on the ramp above the book. I then collected data for ten seconds and recorded the mean of the all the data collected. I repeated this three times. Here are the results:

  • The ramp is 73º.
  • Mass of book: 1.85 kg

Book on metal track

Trial 1Trial 2Trial 3Average
Mean4.3705.0015.2754.882
St Dev0.07730.06950.0410
Reading on LabQuest. The numbers are negative because it is pushing on the sensor.
Reading on LabQuest. The numbers are negative because it is pushing on the sensor. Range is only 0.05 N.

Book on sandpaper on track

Trial 1Trial 2Trial 3Average
Mean2.5412.8212.7962.719
St Dev0.03060.01290.0073

Other results

I tried measuring the force of static friction between the book and the ramp when the ramp was horizontal. My results weren’t very consistent, but I got 3.06, 3.96, and 3.47.

Conclusion

The difference between the force exerted by the force sensor (acting as the “wall” in the problem) were significantly different when comparing the metal surface to sandpaper, and both are less than the “x component” of the force of gravity (“x” being parallel to the ramp), which should be 5.3 N:

So, while the problem may be assuming you can ignore the friction force between the ramp and the block, I conclude that this is not wise unless the problem specifically states to ignore friction.

Other thoughts

I noticed that on every trial, the value of the force decreased during the ten seconds I collected data (the LabQuest screen above shows negative numbers, so the force is getting less negative).

Lee

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.